| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T27 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca |
|
| Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:40:14 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T27 > > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T27 - Section 4.6.36 - what is the max length of the > Message Element field? > > I guess we have to assume that a message element could be > 65535, so I have made the necessary changes: > > <text> > 4.6.36. Returned Message Element > [...] > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Reason | Length | Message Element... > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > Length: The length of the Message Element field, which MUST > NOT exceed 65535 octets. > </text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Review T27 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T27 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T27 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.