Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T27
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromascaavaya.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T27
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T27 - Section 4.6.36 - what is the max length of the 
> Message Element field? 
> 
> I guess we have to assume that a message element could be 
> 65535, so I have made the necessary changes:
> 
> <text>
> 4.6.36.  Returned Message Element
> [...]
> 
>    0                   1                   2                   3
>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |    Reason     |    Length     |       Message Element...
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>    Length:   The length of the Message Element field, which MUST
>       NOT exceed 65535 octets.
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.