Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T15
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromascaavaya.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 7:08 PM
> To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: Re: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T15
> 
> This should have been T15.
> 
> PatC 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 8:36 AM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T14
> 
> All,
>  
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
>  
>    T15 - Section 4.6.4, 4,6,5 - what is the max size of the AC names? 
> 
> I am proposing the following resolution, and figured that the 
> proposed maximum size is 512 bytes for an AC name:
> 
> <text>
> 4.6.4.  AC Name
> [...]
> 
>    AC Name:   A variable length UTF-8 encoded string containing the AC
>       name, whose maximum size MUST NOT exceed 512 bytes.
> 
> 4.6.5.  AC Name with Index
> [...]
> 
>    AC Name:   A variable length UTF-8 encoded string containing the AC
>       name, whose maximum size MUST NOT exceed 512 bytes.
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.