Capwap Mailing List: Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T12

[Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca]

I won't fight this to death but I still find it confusing. Writhing 4 in
a field which can be either 4 or 5 may confuse other as well. What about
4/5? 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:40 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T12
> 
> All,
> 
> The following is the IESG Comment Review:
> 
>    T12 - Section 4.6.1 - in the AC Descriptor protocol 
> diagram delete =4 from the Type 
>    filed (it can be 4 or 5 as I understand)
> 
> Actually, the reason why this is part of the diagram is 
> because both 4 and 5 MUST be included (as described in the 
> field description). So in order to make this much clearer, we 
> have included this in the diagram.
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
>