| Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) | |
That's a good question. The primary difference, as I understand it, is whether a non-root based application could access the port. I suppose that since CAPWAP is likely to be implemented on embedded systems, and not on multi-purpose computers, then perhaps a reserved port is fine. Further, since authentication is mandatory to establish the control plane, perhaps the actual port number matters less. Thoughts? PatC -----Original Message----- From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund [at] ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 1:37 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) Cc: capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: Re: [Capwap] Question about IANA UDP Port Request I would like to note that you actually will need to provide a motivation for port in the range 0-1023 is needed. What, benefit is there really compared to be using one in the range 1024-49151? Cheers Magnus Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) skrev: > yes > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott G. Kelly [mailto:s.kelly [at] ix.netcom.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:58 PM > To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: Re: [Capwap] Question about IANA UDP Port Request > > By "at the system level", do you mean <= 1024? > > -----Original Message----- >> From: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <pcalhoun [at] cisco.com> >> Sent: Apr 10, 2008 4:52 PM >> To: capwap [at] frascone.com >> Subject: [Capwap] Question about IANA UDP Port Request >> >> All, >> >> IANA has come back to me after I requested two UDP ports asking >> whether > >> these ports really need to be at the system level. I believe they >> need to, but thought I'd solicit thoughts from the rest of the >> working > group. >> PatC >> _________________________________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap >> >> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap > -- Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287 Färögatan 6 | Fax +46 8 7575550 S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund [at] ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
-
Question about IANA UDP Port Request Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 10 2008
-
Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Scott G. Kelly, April 10 2008
-
Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 10 2008
- Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Magnus Westerlund, April 11 2008
- Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 11 2008
- Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Margaret Wasserman, April 11 2008
- Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Puneet Agarwal, May 2 2008
- Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Michael.G.Williams, May 2 2008
-
Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 10 2008
-
Re: Question about IANA UDP Port Request Scott G. Kelly, April 10 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.