Capwap Mailing List: Re: Issue 34: keyPurposeID needs clarification

[Sam Hartman (hartmans-ietf]

>>>>> "Pat" == Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) <pcalhoun [at] cisco.com> writes:

    Pat> Sam,
    Pat> Would you accept some text that simply states that the Any KeyPurposeID
    Pat> SHOULD be ignored?

Yes, although I'd like to understand why you believe that's the right
answer.  That's sort of the opposite answer most people give.  But if
you've thought it through and believe that's the right answer that
would respond to my issue.