| Re: FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu) (achoudhu cisco.com)
|
|
| Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:50:50 -0800 (PST) | |
|
There does seem to be an alignment problem
-
even in the latest draft (v08).
The text however says:
WBID: A 5 bit field
which is the wireless binding identifier.
The
identifier will indicate the type of wireless packet type associated with the radio. The following values are defined: 1 - IEEE
802.11
2 - IEEE
802.16
3 -
EPCGlobal
So, WBID should be 5bits wide and Flags 3bits
wide.
Thanks,
Abhijit
From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:27 AM To: capwap Subject: [Capwap] FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Forwarding for an outside reader.
-Bob From: Jeff Gembler [mailto:jgembler [at] intelleflex.com] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 1:55 PM To: sag_ro_wg [at] lists.epcglobalinc.org Subject: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header I have been reading the CAPWAP
spec: Network
Working
Group
P. Calhoun, Editor
Internet-Draft
Cisco Systems, Inc. Expires:
December 13,
2007
M. Montemurro, Editor
Research In Motion
D. Stanley, Editor
June
11, 2007
CAPWAP Protocol Specification
draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-specification-07 Page 40 shows the binary encoding
for the CAPWAP Header. There is a text alignment problem on
this page. The WBID field is shown as,
what would appear to be, 4.5 bits in
length. The Flags field, 3.5 bits in
length. What is correct 5,3 bits
? 4,4 bits ? Intelleflex |
-
FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Bob O'Hara (boohara), November 19 2007
- Re: FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu), November 19 2007
- Re: FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Bob O'Hara (boohara), November 19 2007
-
Re: FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), November 25 2007
- Re: FW: [sag_ro_wg] CAPWAP Spec, CAPWAP Header Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), December 3 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.