| Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:24:10 -0700 (PDT) | |
My apologies. I sould have said RFC 1191 and 1981, which specify ICMP-based Path MTU Discovery for IP versions 4 and 6, respectively. PatC -----Original Message----- From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:margaret [at] thingmagic.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:50 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) Cc: capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: Re: [Capwap] Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement What would it mean to state that MTU discovery must be performed using ICMP? Is there a particular mechanism we'd reference? Margaret On Oct 12, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) wrote: > This issue argues that CAPWAP needs to adopt an MTU discovery > mechanism, similar to that described in RFC 4821. Is it not acceptable > to include text that simply states that MTU discovery must be > performed using ICMP? > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
-
Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), October 12 2007
-
Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Margaret Wasserman, October 17 2007
- Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), October 21 2007
- Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), November 16 2007
- Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), December 3 2007
- Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Margaret Wasserman, December 4 2007
-
Re: Issue 3: MTU Discovery Requirement Margaret Wasserman, October 17 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.