| Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jim Murphy (jmurphy |
|
| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:10 -0700 (PDT) | |
Pat,
One minor comment in line...
Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) wrote:
Given that, I would like to send the proposed text to the list. Please
note that it is nearly identical to Jim's original text, with a couple
of very small tweaks, which I believe are necessary given the change in
direction. These are all editorial in nature.
<proposed text>
4. CAPWAP Packet Formats
This section contains the CAPWAP protocol packet formats. A CAPWAP protocol packet consists of one or more CAPWAP Transport Layer packet headers followed by a CAPWAP message. The CAPWAP message can be either of type Control or Data, where Control packets carry signaling, and Data packets carry user payloads. The CAPWAP frame formats for CAPWAP Data packets, and for DTLS encapsulated CAPWAP Data and Control packets are defined below.
The CAPWAP Control protocol includes two messages that are never protected by DTLS: the Discovery Request message and the Discovery Response message. These messages need to be in the clear to allow the CAPWAP protocol to properly identify and process them. The format of these packets are as follows:
CAPWAP Control Packet (Discovery Request/Response): +-------------------------------------------+ | IP | UDP | CAPWAP | Control | Message | | Hdr | Hdr | Header | Header | Element(s) | +-------------------------------------------+
All other CAPWAP control protocol messages MUST be protected via the DTLS protocol, which ensures that the packets are both authenticated and encrypted. These packets include the CAPWAP DTLS Header, which is described in Section 4.2. The format of these packets is as follows:
CAPWAP Control Packet (DTLS Security Required): +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IP | UDP | CAPWAP | DTLS | CAPWAP | Control| Message | DTLS | | Hdr | Hdr | DTLS Hdr | Hdr | Header | Header | Element(s)| Trlr | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ \---------- authenticated -----------/ \------------- encrypted ------------/
The CAPWAP protocol allows optional protection of data packets, using DTLS. Use of data packet protection is determined by AC policy. When DTLS is utilized, the optional CAPWAP DTLS Header is present, which is described in Section 4.2. The format of CAPWAP data packets is shown below:
You can remove the "CAPWAP Preamble" box from the following diagram as it is implicit in the CAPWAP header. Also, this header structure should be the same as the non-DTLS structure for control packets shown above.
CAPWAP Plain Text Data Packet : +-----------------------------------------+ | IP | UDP | CAPWAP | CAPWAP | Wireless | | Hdr | Hdr | Preamble| Header | Payload | +-----------------------------------------+
DTLS Secured CAPWAP Data Packet: +--------------------------------------------------------+ | IP | UDP | CAPWAP | DTLS | CAPWAP | Wireless | DTLS | | Hdr | Hdr | DTLS Hdr | Hdr | Hdr | Payload | Trlr | +--------------------------------------------------------+ \------ authenticated -----/ \------- encrypted --------/
UDP Header: All CAPWAP packets are encapsulated within UDP. Section Section 3 defines the specific UDP usage.
CAPWAP DTLS Header: All DTLS encrypted CAPWAP protocol packets are prefixed with the CAPWAP DTLS header (see Section 4.2).
DTLS Header: The DTLS header provides authentication and encrytion services to the CAPWAP payload it encapsulates. This protocol is defined in RFC 4347 [8].
CAPWAP Header: All CAPWAP protocol packets use a common header that immediately follows the CAPWAP preamble or DTLS header. The CAPWAP Header is defined in Section 4.3.
Wireless Payload: A CAPWAP protocol packet that contains a wireless payload is a CAPWAP data packet. The CAPWAP protocol does not specify the format of the wireless payload, which is defined by the appropriate wireless standard. Additional information is in Section 4.4.
Control Header: The CAPWAP protocol includes a signalling component, known as the CAPWAP control protocol. All CAPWAP control packets include a Control Header, which is defined in Section 4.5.1. CAPWAP data packets do not contain a Control Header field.
Message Elements: A CAPWAP Control packet includes one or more message elements, which are found immediately following the Control Header. These message elements are in a Type/Length/value style header, defined in Section 4.6.
A CAPWAP implementation MUST be capable of receiving a reassembled CAPWAP message of length 4096 bytes. A CAPWAP implementation MAY indicate that it supports a higher maximum message length, by including the Maximum Message Length message element, see Section 4.6.29 in the Join Request message or the Join Response message.
4.1. CAPWAP Preamble
The CAPWAP preamble header common to all CAPWAP transport headers and is used to identify the header type that immediately follows. The reason for this header to is avoid needing to perform byte comparisons in order to guess whether the frame is DTLS encrypted or not. It also provides an extensibility framework that can be used to support additional transport types. The format of the frame is as follows:
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Version| Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Version: A 4 bit field which contains the version of CAPWAP used in this packet. The value for this specification is zero (0).
Payload Type: A 4 bit field which specifies the payload type that follows the preamble header. The following values are supported:
0 - CAPWAP Header. The CAPWAP Header (see Section 4.3) immediately follows the the CAPWAP Preamble Header. If the packet is received on the CAPWAP data channel, the CAPWAP stack MUST treat the packet as a clear text CAPWAP data packet. If received on the CAPWAP control channel, the CAPWAP stack MUST treat the packet as a clear text CAPWAP control packet. If the control packet is not a Discovery Request or Discovery Response packet, the packet MUST be dropped.
1 - CAPWAP DTLS Header. The CAPWAP DTLS Header, and DTLS packet, immediately follows the CAPWAP Preamble Header (see Section 4.2).
4.2. CAPWAP DTLS Header
The CAPWAP DTLS Header is used to identify the packet as a DTLS encrypted packet. The first eight bits includes the common CAPWAP Preamble Header. The remaining 24 bits are padding to ensure 4 byte alignment, and MAY be used in a future version of the protocol. The DTLS packet [8] always immediately follows this header. The format of the CAPWAP DTLS Header is as follows:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |CAPWAP Preamble| Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
CAPWAP Preamble: The CAPWAP Preamble header is defined in Section 4.1. The CAPWAP Preamble Header's Payload Type field MUST be set to one (1).
Reserved: The 24-bit field is reserved for future use. All implementations complying with this protocol MUST set to zero any bits that are reserved in the version of the protocol supported by that implementation. Receivers MUST ignore all bits not defined for the version of the protocol they support.
4.3. CAPWAP Header
All CAPWAP protocol messages are encapsulated using a common header format, regardless of the CAPWAP control or CAPWAP Data transport used to carry the messages. However, certain flags are not applicable for a given transport. Refer to the specific transport section in order to determine which flags are valid.
Note that the optional fields defined in this section MUST be present in the precise order shown below.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |CAPWAP Preamble| HLEN | RID | WBID |T|F|L|W|M|K|Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Fragment ID | Frag Offset |Rsvd | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (optional) Radio MAC Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (optional) Wireless Specific Information | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Payload .... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
CAPWAP Preamble: The CAPWAP Preamble header is defined in Section 4.1. The CAPWAP Preamble Header's Payload Type field MUST be set to zero (0). If the CAPWAP DTLS Header is present, the version number in both CAPWAP Preamble Headers MUST match. The reason for this duplicate field is to avoid any possible tampering of the version field in the preamble header which is not encrypted or authenticated.
HLEN: A 5 bit field containing the length of the CAPWAP transport header in 4 byte words (Similar to IP header length). This length includes the optional headers.
RID: A 5 bit field which contains the Radio ID number for this packet. Given that MAC Addresses are not necessarily unique across physical radios in a WTP, the Radio Identifier (RID) field is used to indiciate which physical radio the message is associated with.
WBID: A 5 bit field which is the wireless binding identifier. The identifier will indicate the type of wireless packet type associated with the radio. The following values are defined:
1 - IEEE 802.11
2 - IEEE 802.16
3 - EPCGlobal
T: The Type 'T' bit indicates the format of the frame being transported in the payload. When this bit is set to one (1), the payload has the native frame format indicated by the WBID field. When this bit is zero (0) the payload is an IEEE 802.3 frame.
F: The Fragment 'F' bit indicates whether this packet is a fragment. When this bit is one (1), the packet is a fragment and MUST be combined with the other corresponding fragments to reassemble the complete information exchanged between the WTP and AC.
L: The Last 'L' bit is valid only if the 'F' bit is set and indicates whether the packet contains the last fragment of a fragmented exchange between WTP and AC. When this bit is 1, the packet is the last fragment. When this bit is 0, the packet is not the last fragment.
W: The Wireless 'W' bit is used to specify whether the optional Wireless Specific Information field is present in the header. A value of one (1) is used to represent the fact that the optional header is present.
M: The M bit is used to indicate that the Radio MAC Address optional header is present. This is used to communicate the MAC address of the receiving radio.
K: The 'Keep-alive' K bit indicates the packet is a Data Channel Keep Alive packet. This packet is used to map the data channel to the control channel for the specified Session ID and to maintain freshness of the data channel. The K bit MUST NOT be set for data packets containing user data.
Flags: A set of reserved bits for future flags in the CAPWAP header. All implementations complying with this protocol MUST set to zero any bits that are reserved in the version of the protocol supported by that implementation. Receivers MUST ignore all bits not defined for the version of the protocol they support. </text>
Comments please,
PatC ________________________________
From: Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com [mailto:Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 6:40 PM
To: capwap [at] frascone.com
Cc: margaret [at] thingmagic.com; rbonica [at] juniper.net
Subject: [Capwap] Closure of Issue 244
Dear WG:
Based on the WG response to re-open Issue 244: Preamble Header
Optimization, this issue will be moved to the active issues database and
resolved with the solution proposed in:
http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap/msg04161.html
<http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap/msg04161.html>
There were some objections to resolve since its late to consider optimizations at this stage of the draft, however most responses were in favor of adding the change.
Issue 244 will be reflected in the updates to the CAPWAP drafts during
upcoming WGLC.
If there are no further comments by Thursday, April 26th, Issue 244 will be moved to the active database and closed as agreed by consensus.
Best Regards, Mani, Margaret and Dorothy _________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
-
Closure of Issue 244 Dorothy.Gellert, April 23 2007
-
Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 24 2007
- Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu), April 24 2007
- Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 Jim Murphy, April 24 2007
- Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 Jim Murphy, April 24 2007
-
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu), May 11 2007
- Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), May 14 2007
- Re: Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), July 18 2007
-
Proposed Text for Issue 244 (was: Closure of Issue 244) Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 24 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.