| WTP IPvX address | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sudhanshu (sudhanshu.ietf gmail.com)
|
|
| Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:17:13 -0700 (PDT) | |
Currently we have not defined the WTP IPv6 address message element. WTP IPv6 address message element is not needed as it is used exclusively for NAT? Or do we assume that WTP will not be IPv6 host? If former, "WTP IPv4 address message element" should be optional in join request. If later, what is rational behind this assumption? -Suds
- Re: Fwd: CONSENSUS CONFIRMATION: #138, #217, #247, #248, #249, #250, #251 & #252, (continued)
-
Re: Fwd: CONSENSUS CONFIRMATION: #138, #217, #247, #248, #249, #250, #251 & #252 Sudhanshu, April 11 2007
- Issue 217 Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu), April 11 2007
- Re: Issue 217 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 11 2007
- Re: Issue 217 Margaret Wasserman, April 12 2007
- WTP IPvX address Sudhanshu, April 12 2007
- Re: WTP IPvX address Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 16 2007
- Re: WTP IPvX address Sudhanshu, April 17 2007
- Re: WTP IPvX address Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), April 20 2007
- Re: WTP IPvX address Sudhanshu, April 23 2007
-
Re: Fwd: CONSENSUS CONFIRMATION: #138, #217, #247, #248, #249, #250, #251 & #252 Sudhanshu, April 11 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.