Capwap Mailing List: Re: Proposed Text for Issue 254

[Puneet Agarwal (pagarwal]

Hi Abhijit,

 

Thanks for the clarifying text. One might add a note that the port at the WTP is an implementation (os) choice.

Please see my proposed additions (in <>) below.

 

Thanks.

 

-Puneet

---

From: Abhijit Choudhury [mailto:abhijit10425 [at] yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:42 AM
To: Puneet Agarwal; capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: Re: Proposed Text for Issue 254

I think this reads a little better....

Abhijit


Replace

    CAPWAP protocol control packets sent between the WTP and the AC use
    well known UDP port [to be IANA assigned].  CAPWAP protocol data
    packets sent between the WTP and the AC use UDP port [to be IANA
    assigned].

With
     CAPWAP protocol control packets sent from the WTP to the AC use
     well known UDP port [to be IANA assigned] at the AC[Puneet Agarwal]  <and an implementation chosen port at the WTP> . CAPWAP protocol data
     packets sent from the WTP to the AC use UDP port [to be IANA
     assigned] at the AC[Puneet Agarwal]  <and an implementation chosen port at the WTP>. In either case, for packets sent by the AC to the WTP,
     the source and destination ports are reversed.




-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:44 AM
To: Puneet Agarwal; capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Proposed Text for Issue 249: IPv6 UDP Lite

Created new issue 254

PatC

-----Original Message-----
From: Puneet Agarwal [mailto:pagarwal [at] broadcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:50 PM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] Proposed Text for Issue 249: IPv6 UDP Lite

Hi Pat,

"CAPWAP protocol control packets sent between the WTP and the AC use
   well known UDP port [to be IANA assigned]."

Does this mean that if the IANA assigned CAPWAP control port is "x",
then for all capwap control packets between WTP and AC (in both
directions), the udp src and the udp dest will always be set to "x"?

Thanks.

-Puneet

-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:26 AM
To: capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: [Capwap] Proposed Text for Issue 249: IPv6 UDP Lite

All,

In the event that the WG agrees that we are to proceed with this change,
I would like to submit proposed text to the list. As discussed on the
mailing list previously, UDP-Lite would be restricted to IPv6. Yes, it
does have some NAT transversal issues, which is why some text was added
to the NAT Considerations section. However, there are no IPv6 NATs
today, so there is nothing legacy broken in this proposal. Note that I
also added the proper reference to UDP number assignment in the IANA
considerations as well.


3.  CAPWAP Transport

   Communication between a WTP and an AC is established according to the
   standard UDP client/server model.  The CAPWAP protocol supports two
   different transport protocols.  When used over IPv4, the UDP protocol
   is utilized.  When CAPWAP is used over IPv6, the UDP-Lite RFC 3828
   [13] is used.  This section details the specifics of how the CAPWAP
   protocol works with IP.

3.1.  UDP Transport

   One of the CAPWAP protocol requirements is to allow a WTP to reside
   behind a firewall and/or Network Address Translation (NAT) device.
   Since the connection is initiated by the WTP (client) to the well-
   known UDP port of the AC (server), the use of UDP is a logical
   choice.  The UDP checksum field in CAPWAP packets MUST be set to
   zero.

   CAPWAP protocol control packets sent between the WTP and the AC use
   well known UDP port [to be IANA assigned].  CAPWAP protocol data
   packets sent between the WTP and the AC use UDP port [to be IANA
   assigned].

3.2.  UDP-Lite Transport

   When CAPWAP is run over IPv6, the UDP-Lite is used as the transport.
   The reason for using UDP-Lite is because when UDP is run over IPv6,
   it MUST NOT have its checksum field set to zero, which increases the
   processing cost for each CAPWAP packet.  When UDP-Lite is used, the
   checksum field MUST have a coverage of 8 RFC 3828 [13].

   As defined in RFC 3828 [13], UDP-Lite uses the same port assignments
   as UDP.
[...]

11.  NAT Considerations
[...]
   When CAPWAP is run over IPv6, NAT support can only be provided if the
   IPv6 NAT system is capable of performing address translation over the
   UDP-Lite 3828 protocol [13].

[...]
14.  IANA Considerations

   A separate UDP port for data channel communications is (currently)
   the selected demultiplexing mechanism, and a port must be assigned
   for this purpose in section Section 3.1.  The UDP port numbers are
   listed by IANA at http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers.


Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap

---

Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.

---

Now that's room service! Choose 
from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find 
your fit.