Capwap Mailing List: Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 224/89 (and part of 146)

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

I typed too fast. To keep bringing up the use of a single port has been
decided by the WG. I will let the chairs respond to this.

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Murphy [mailto:jmurphy [at] trapezenetworks.com] 
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:52 AM
> To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
> Cc: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: Re: [Capwap] Proposed Resolution for Issue 224/89 
> (and part of 146)
> 
> 
> 
> Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) wrote:
> > Puneet,
> >  
> > Addressing your specific list of options:
> > 1) Continuing to bring up the removal of the MUX is simply 
> a waste of 
> > time. The WG has decided, so let's move on please.
> 
> When was this WG decision made? Your original proposal (this 
> thread) was made on Nov. 22, 2006 (after the IETF meeting) 
> and we are merely discussing the merits of the proposal on 
> the mailing list, as we should.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
>