Capwap Mailing List: Re: need clarification on UDP ports

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

Issue 227 created.

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:margaret [at] thingmagic.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:49 AM
> To: Scott G Kelly
> Cc: capwap
> Subject: Re: [Capwap] need clarification on UDP ports
> 
> 
> Hi Scott,
> 
> On Oct 26, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Scott G Kelly wrote:
> > But I think the assumption that encryption on the data port 
> is binary 
> > on/off is a little premature. I think that for any given 
> WTP, it will 
> > be binary, but that for a given deployment, some WTPs could require 
> > data channel encryption while others do not.
> 
> Good point.  I'm now convinced (by this note and Pat's) that 
> it would be best to include a short header on both the data 
> and control channels to indicate whether the packet is a DTLS 
> packet or an unencrypted packet.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
>