Re: New mux header for CAPWAP
From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) (booharacisco.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Dorothy,

This decision to use a mux header is quite different from my
recollection of the consensus on this issue.  In the spirit of open
standards development, can you document the chairs' discussion and how
you came to this decision?  If this decision is your assessment of rough
consensus in the working group, I fear your math is severely flawed and
ask that you document those you feel favor this mux header and those
your feel do not.

 -Bob
  

 

________________________________

From: Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com [mailto:Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:45 PM
To: capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: [Capwap] New mux header for CAPWAP




The CAPWAP editors have asked the Chairs to resolve the Mux vs Multiport
issue # 115, in order to progress the specification.  Based on the
discussion that has taken place the chairs are in agreement the
simplest, cleanest solution for this is to add a Mux header.  Barring
any unforseen events, we will instruct the editors resolve in favor of a
new Mux header.

We intend to close this issue by the end of the week, Friday, 6/9.
Please review the issue and send any constructive comments to the list
by Friday. 

Best Regards, 
Dorothy 



Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.