| Re: New mux header for CAPWAP | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) (boohara |
|
| Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT) | |
Dorothy, This decision to use a mux header is quite different from my recollection of the consensus on this issue. In the spirit of open standards development, can you document the chairs' discussion and how you came to this decision? If this decision is your assessment of rough consensus in the working group, I fear your math is severely flawed and ask that you document those you feel favor this mux header and those your feel do not. -Bob ________________________________ From: Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com [mailto:Dorothy.Gellert [at] nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:45 PM To: capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: [Capwap] New mux header for CAPWAP The CAPWAP editors have asked the Chairs to resolve the Mux vs Multiport issue # 115, in order to progress the specification. Based on the discussion that has taken place the chairs are in agreement the simplest, cleanest solution for this is to add a Mux header. Barring any unforseen events, we will instruct the editors resolve in favor of a new Mux header. We intend to close this issue by the end of the week, Friday, 6/9. Please review the issue and send any constructive comments to the list by Friday. Best Regards, Dorothy
-
New mux header for CAPWAP Dorothy.Gellert, June 6 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Charles Clancy, June 8 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 7 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Bob O'Hara (boohara), June 7 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Scott G. Kelly, June 7 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 8 2006
-
Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Rohit Suri (rsuri), June 8 2006
- Re: New mux header for CAPWAP Charles Clancy, June 8 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.