Capwap Mailing List: RE: Editorial question - Location of Message elements

[Bob O'Hara (boohara) (boohara]

Well, we shouldn't consolidate ALL the message elements in one section.  I think that the elements used in the base protocol should be consolidated in one section and those for the 802.11 binding in another.

 -Bob
 

 

---

From: Saravanan Govindan [mailto:Saravanan.Govindan [at] sg.panasonic.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:52 PM
To: Dorothy Stanley; capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] Editorial question - Location of Message elements

Dorothy,

 

I think structuring all the message elements in a single section is very useful. It helps make reading easier.

 

Saravanan

 

 

 

 

---

From: Dorothy Stanley [mailto:dstanley1389 [at] gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 1:41 AM
To: capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: [Capwap] Editorial question - Location of Message elements

 

All,

In the -00 draft, the CAPWAP message elements are defined in multiple sections, specifically the section defining
the first message in which a particular message element appears.

I propose to collect all of the message element definitions in a single section, so that there is
one place where they are all defined, and can easily be found.

Is there any objection to proceeding with this editorial change?

At the CAPWAP meeting on Monday, there seemed to be support for this approach, with
Pat noting that he LWAPP draft at one point was organized this way, but was then changed, due to
comments received. So, comments please on this proposed editorial change to the CAPWAP  draft specification.

Thanks,

Dorothy

-----------------
Dorothy Stanley
Aruba Networks
630-363-1389 (cell) 630-836-9734 (office)