Capwap Mailing List: Re: Certificates, Discovery Request/Reply, and validation.

[Yoshihiro Ohba (yohba]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:58:27PM -0700, Pat R. Calhoun wrote:
> >> This was in response to Alper's "why isn't PANA sufficient". We don't care 
> >> about the above... it just works - hence the beauty of LWAPP.
> >
> > This sounds like handling 802.11[e,h,i,k,x] on AR is out of the scope
> > of CAPWAP.
> 
> What it means is that defining or changing 802.11* is out of scope of LWAPP. 
> What is in scope if defining a protocol whereby 802.11* frames can be 
> forwarded from the AP to the AR. Processing of these frames is done as 
> specified in the appropriate SDO document.
> 

OK.  On the other hand, it is still debatable whether a protocol to
forward 802.11 frames from AP to AR needs to be defined or just using
an existing protocol (e.g., L2TP) is enough.  

> PatC

Yoshihiro Ohba