| RE: (no subject) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat R. Calhoun (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: 17 Jul 2003 12:55:53 -0000 | |
> Why not achieve these goals by: > - Running PANA between the station and access router. PANA assumes a completely different architecture - not one that any of the startups seemed to have adopted. I suppose it would be ok for the IETF to work on something that is not being productized, but I'd wonder why... > - Having AP relay interesting IEEE 802.11 bits to the access router as it > bridges (forwards) the packets. This can be carried as some sort of auxilary > data as part of the IEEE headers. IEEE (SDO) could define this. This is what LWAPP does, right? I don't see this as a MAC or PHY layer thing, so I don't see why IEEE would be interested. PatC
- RE: (no subject), (continued)
- RE: (no subject) Pat R. Calhoun, July 17 2003
- RE: (no subject) Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, July 17 2003
-
RE: (no subject) Pat R. Calhoun, July 17 2003
- Re: (no subject) Alper Yegin, July 17 2003
- RE: (no subject) Pat R. Calhoun, July 17 2003
- Re: (no subject) Alper Yegin, July 17 2003
-
RE: (no subject) Pat R. Calhoun, July 17 2003
- Re: (no subject) Alper Yegin, July 17 2003
- (no subject) Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), September 5 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.